<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NGC 6894</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skythisweek.com/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skythisweek.com/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/</link>
	<description>Occasional observations of an amateur astronomer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Above the clouds &#187; NGC 6894</title>
		<link>http://www.skythisweek.com/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Above the clouds &#187; NGC 6894</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 02:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raben.com/weblog/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/#comment-273</guid>
		<description>[...] NGC 6894 is located in the constellation Cygnus and is aprrox 4000 light yrs away with a visual mag of +12.3.One site that I visited while searching for info on this neb,compared it to the size of Jupiter.Well,I don&#8217;t know if I believe that but,I will definitely say &#8220;it is extremely small&#8221;!!!. Vern over at Verns Astronomy Weblog has a really nice shot of it&#8230;..check it out,you won&#8217;t be disapointed!!. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NGC 6894 is located in the constellation Cygnus and is aprrox 4000 light yrs away with a visual mag of +12.3.One site that I visited while searching for info on this neb,compared it to the size of Jupiter.Well,I don&#8217;t know if I believe that but,I will definitely say &#8220;it is extremely small&#8221;!!!. Vern over at Verns Astronomy Weblog has a really nice shot of it&#8230;..check it out,you won&#8217;t be disapointed!!. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vern</title>
		<link>http://www.skythisweek.com/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Vern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raben.com/weblog/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to seeing your image!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to seeing your image!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.skythisweek.com/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raben.com/weblog/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>I processed the heck out of the Cats eye neb.It came out pretty nice but,if you don&#039;t mind,I would like to send you the processed image (via e-mail).I am worried that I have over processed it.I have seen the Hubbles image but,I need a human eye to give me a idea about what I have done wrong/right and I trust your judgement.I won&#039;t be able to send it right away because,I need to step out.Perhaps later this afternoon?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I processed the heck out of the Cats eye neb.It came out pretty nice but,if you don&#8217;t mind,I would like to send you the processed image (via e-mail).I am worried that I have over processed it.I have seen the Hubbles image but,I need a human eye to give me a idea about what I have done wrong/right and I trust your judgement.I won&#8217;t be able to send it right away because,I need to step out.Perhaps later this afternoon?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vern</title>
		<link>http://www.skythisweek.com/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Vern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raben.com/weblog/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t try to view it visually through an eyepiece, too light polluted here to see a dim fuzzy like this one directly. I&#039;ll maybe try that this weekend at FoxPark if the skies clear up.  The nebula was easy to see on the notebook screen while I was taking the images, but not the central star.  I apparently screwed up taking the flat fields, amp-glow in the upper left is noticable in all images I took that evening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t try to view it visually through an eyepiece, too light polluted here to see a dim fuzzy like this one directly. I&#8217;ll maybe try that this weekend at FoxPark if the skies clear up.  The nebula was easy to see on the notebook screen while I was taking the images, but not the central star.  I apparently screwed up taking the flat fields, amp-glow in the upper left is noticable in all images I took that evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.skythisweek.com/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raben.com/weblog/2006/06/21/ngc-6894/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Could you see the neb through the eye piece or were you just able to pull the structure out through processing?.Regardless,that is a nice shot!.
Clear skies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you see the neb through the eye piece or were you just able to pull the structure out through processing?.Regardless,that is a nice shot!.<br />
Clear skies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

